indicator
Loading...
NASCAR RacePointsEarn PointsView Rewards

Blogs

Wheels48HMS's blog

More COT Musings

Saturday March 29, 2008 @ 12:30 PM EDT

Supposedly the “powers that be” at NASCAR came up with the COT is so that only one chassis could be used at most – if not all – types of tracks. Theoretically this would help the one and two car teams would be able to compete with the “big boys” even though they are only running one or two cars. Does anybody seriously think that this is what is happening?

It is a given that each team brings two cars to a track so that if the driver wrecks in qualifying or practice they will have a secondary car to use in the race.

But, does anybody seriously believe that Hendrick, Rousch, Gibbs, RCR or any of the other big guns are sticking to one or two chassis? Does anybody seriously believe that anyone is running the same chassis at Bristol and Martinsville, that they were running at Daytona, California, or Vegas?

The dynamics are so great between the different tracks teams use one chassis to run at similar tracks, but they have different chassis for road courses, superspeedways, intermediate, and short tracks.

So, is the COT really cutting costs for the smaller teams? I don’t think it’s helping the smaller teams as much as NASCAR would like, but it may be helping a little bit.

What do you all think?

Rating: 4 Votes
  • Currently 2.25/5 Stars.
Tags:
(none)
11 Comments
  • Viewing 1-10 of 11
  • ‹ Prev | Next ›
  • Page << 1 2 >> of 2
  • Viewing 1-10 of 11
  • ‹ Prev | Next ›
  • Page << 1 2 >> of 2
Help/Contact Us|Privacy Policy|Terms of Use|About NASCAR|About NASCAR.COM|Jobs|Official Sponsors|Advertising

All External sites will open in a new browser window. NASCAR.COM does not endorse external sites.

© 2008 NASCAR | Turner Sports Interactive, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Turner Entertainment Digital Network NASCAR.COM is part of the Turner Sports and Entertainment Digital Network

Powered by Cisco Systems, Inc.

release-2.0.4/450 Mon Jul 7 05:29:37 UTC 2008